Zsombor Piros vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Jul at 04:35 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Z. Piros vs N. Fatic

HUN
2
Win
Played
1
Win

BIH
2
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Piros 2 - 1 Fatic
They have played 8 sets in total, with Zsombor Piros winning 5 and Nerman Fatic winning 3. The last match between Zsombor Piros and Nerman Fatic was at the Zug Challenger, 23-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Zsombor Piros getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Piros | 2 |
| Fatic | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R2) Zug Challenger(07-23-25)
(R1) Split Challenger(04-08-24)
(SF) Sibiu Challenger(09-23-23)
Z. Piros vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
Z. Piros vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Piros secured 44.06% of points on second serve compared to Fatic’s 42.13%. How pivotal is this stat? Typically, it strongly influences match predictions.
- Return Game Strength: Piros has captured 43.37% of points on opponents' second serves, whereas Fatic slightly outperformed with 43.95%. On first serve returns, Fatic again leads with 29.32% over Piros's 28.07%. Who holds the edge here? Fatic might have a slight advantage.
- Pressure Handling: Breakpoint save statistics reveal that Fatic has saved 51.26% compared to Piros's 50.85%. How relevant is this for predictions? It’s valuable for in-game betting scenarios.
- Match Performance: Over the last year, Fatic has a better win rate (73.77%) than Piros (67.69%). Could this indicate Fatic's overall stronger form?
- Favored Surface: Both players have their strongest performances on Clay, with Piros winning 67% of matches and Fatic 61%. Does this point to a balanced competition on this surface?
- Competition Level: Piros has played more consistently at Challenger/ITF tournament levels with better success (70.69%) than Fatic (62.5%). Might this indicate higher consistency in Piros's games?
- Direct Encounters: Both have an even record against each other, each winning once in their two prior meetings with matched set wins of 3-3. Who might break the tie this time?
- Opponent Challenge: Piros faces tougher competitors with an average rank of 287.49 compared to Fatic’s 353.79. How critical is this? It suggests Piros may be more battle-tested.
- Deciding Set Record: Fatic excels in deciding sets with an 83% win rate, outmatching Piros’s 60% over the last year. If it's a tight match, could Fatic be expected to edge it out?
- Breakpoint Conversion: Fatic has a superior recent breakpoint conversion rate at 36.84% over Piros’s 34.13%. Does this give Fatic a critical advantage for breaking serve?
Editorial Prediction (July 23, 2025, UTC):
Both Piros and Fatic exhibit formidable clay court skills, having demonstrated their prowess with strong win percentages on their favored surface. Historically, their matches have been tightly contested, with no clear head-to-head front runner thus far.
Despite Piros showcasing slightly superior consistency at higher competition levels and against tougher opponents, Fatic's impressive track record in deciding sets signals his resilience under pressure.
The ability of both players to convert breakpoints and their capabilities in return games are quite closely matched, with minimal differences that could tilt the match either way depending on the day.
Factoring in recent form and performance indicators, Fatic’s edge under high-pressure situations and a marginally better overall match-winning rate could make him the likely winner of this upcoming encounter.
Zsombor Piros vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Z. Piros vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 37 | Games Won | 30 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:34:20 | Average Match Time | 1:34:20 |
| 58% (111/190) | 1st Serve % | 62% (131/211) |
| 73% (81/111) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (81/131) |
| 51% (40/79) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (41/80) |
| 42% (11/26) | Break Pts Won % | 53% (8/15) |
| 42% (89/211) | Return Points Win % | 36% (69/190) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Z. Piros Recent Matches Played
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

Z. Piros vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.93% (309/182) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.49% (403/286) |
| 59.69% (687/464) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.51% (888/656) |
| 52.82% (5794/5175) | Games Win/Loss | 53.04% (7574/6706) |
| 52.81% (47/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 66.67% (202/101) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.00% (341/218) |
| 60.92% (53/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.18% (19/25) |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1485 | Aces Total | 1568 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1250 | Total Double Faults | 1510 |
| 1:35:28 | Average Match Time | 1:19:52 |
| 448.18 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.74 |
| 60% (20571/34039) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23679/35628) |
| 66% (13639/20571) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15504/23679) |
| 52% (6969/13468) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5733/11949) |
| 45% (1604/3597) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1961/4201) |
| 41% (13855/33651) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15552/35990) |
| 50.00% (13/13) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 73.33% (11/4) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 22.22% (4/14) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 63.23% (184/107) | Challenger W/L | 52.91% (118/105) |
| 69.57% (96/42) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (277/161) |
| 63% (299/473) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (394/661) |
| 17% (1/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 56% (89/160) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/156) |
| 57% (99/174) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/188) |
| 85% (294/251) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (393/347) |
| 15% (294/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (393/42) |
| 29% (196/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (296/57) |